Monday, May 17, 2010

What went down in Rwanda before 1994?



I ran into excerpts of this book, and it has some fine, well researched observations on the Rwanda Genocide contrary to the public opinions.

Enjoy

To accept the standard model of “The Genocide,” one must ignore the large-scale killing and ethnic cleansing of Hutus by the RPF long before the April-July 1994 period, which began when Ugandan forces invaded Rwanda under President (and dictator) Yoweri Museveni on October 1, 1990. At its inception, the RPF was a wing of the Ugandan army, the RPF’s leader, Paul Kagame, having served as director of Ugandan military intelligence in the 1980s. The Ugandan invasion and resultant combat were not a “civil war,” but rather a clear case of aggression. However, the invasion led to no reprimand or cessation of support by the United States or Britain—and, in contrast to Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait just two months before, which was countered in the Security Council by a same-day demand that Iraq withdraw its forces immediately—the Council took no action on the Ugandan invasion of Rwanda until March 1993. It did not even authorize an observer mission (UNOMUR) until late June 1993, the RPF by then having occupied much of northern Rwanda and driven out several hundred thousand Hutu farmers.


More

Paul Kagame and the RPF were creatures of U.S. power from their origins in Uganda in the 1980s. Allan Stam, a Rwanda scholar who once served with the U.S. Army Special Forces, notes that Kagame “had spent some time at Fort Leavenworth…not too far before the 1994 genocide.” Fort Leavenworth is the U.S. Army’s “commander general staff college…where rising stars of the U.S. military and other places go to get training as they are on track to become generals. The training that they get there is on planning large scale operations. It’s not planning small-scale logistic things. It’s not tactics. It’s about how do you plan an invasion. And apparently [Kagame] did very well.”

By 1994, Kagame’s RPF possessed, in addition to the necessary manpower and material, a sophisticated plan for seizing power in Rwanda that, in its final execution, Stam says, “looks staggeringly like the United States’ invasion of Iraq in 1991.” Stam adds that the RPF launched its final assault on the Rwandan government almost immediately after the assassination of Habyarimana, within 60 to 120 minutes of the shooting-down of his jet, with “50,000 [RPF] soldiers mov[ing] into action on two fronts, in a coordinated fashion”—clearly “a plan that was not worked out on the back of an envelope


More excerpts

Very big lies about Rwanda are now institutionalized and are part of the common (mis)understanding in the West. In reality, Rwanda’s Paul Kagame is one of the great mass murderers of our time, far surpassing Uganda’s former dictator Idi Amin.41 Yet, thanks to the remarkable myth structure that surrounds him, he enjoys immense popularity with his chief patron in Washington, his image of big-time killer transmuted into that of an honored savior, deserving strong Western support. Philip Gourevitch, one of Kagame’s prime apologists for many years, portrays him as an emancipator, a “man of action with an acute human and political intelligence,” who “made things happen.” He also compares Kagame to “another famously tall and skinny civil warrior, Abraham Lincoln.”42 A more recent hagiography by Stephen Kinzer portrays Kagame as the founding father of a New Africa, “one of the most amazing untold stories of the modern history of revolution,” as Kinzer explains it, because Kagame overthrew a dictatorship, stopped a genocide, and turned Rwanda into “one of the great stars” of the continent, with Western investment and favorable PR flowing.43 In fact, what Kagame overthrew was a multiethnic, power-sharing, coalition government; what Kagame imposed was a Tutsi-dominated dictatorship; and what Kagame turned Rwanda and the whole of Central Africa into was a rolling genocide that is ongoing. But it is true that he is a shining “star” in the Western firmament and its propaganda system


One more

The Pentagon has very actively supported these invasions of the DRC, even more heavily than it supported the RPF’s drive to take Kigali. This support led to the killing of many thousands of Hutu refugees in a series of mass slaughters (ca. 1994-1997), and also provided cover for a greater series of Kagame-Museveni assaults on the DRC that have destabilized life in this large country of perhaps sixty million people, with millions perishing in the process.56 In his letter of resignation to Chief Prosecutor Hassan Jallow, Filip Rentjens, a Dutch academic and one-time expert witness before the ICTR, took issue with the “impunity” that protects the RPF leadership from prosecution. “[RPF] crimes fall squarely within the mandate of the ICTR,” he wrote. “[T]hey are well documented, testimonial and material proof is available, and the identity of the RPF suspects is known….It is precisely because the regime in Kigali has been given a sense of impunity that, during the years following 1994, it has committed massive internationally recognized crimes in both Rwanda and the DRC


The rest of excerpts are here

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

I don't know what you find "well researched" information in this book !!

Misleading fact: Uganda forces did not invade Rwanda BUT rather Rwandese refugees who were denied their rights to go back to their motherland for years.

Flawed argument: RPF had a just cause to return home and they articulated what they were fighting for. TO have a right doesn't need a creation by foreign power(s). The tendency that all things that happens in Africa is due a creation of foreign powers is an insult to people's intelligency !

Thuwein said...

I do not think this book is completely misleading as you are trying to suggest. It might be biased but not misleading. The point is RPF is as guilty as anybody else for war crimes during the genocide in Rwanda. And they have successful creating this aura that they are clean and Rwandans liberators.

Look, nobody said all things wrong in Africa is a creation of western powers, but neglecting the influence of western powers in all things wrong in Africa is being ridiculously naive.

GAME THEORY said...

Come on Guys, you can do better than this especially wewe THUWEIN,


I suggest you do your readings na kama una matatizo ya references please feel free to ask.

First of all in defeating the interim government and its army, the RPF ended the genocide . Yes, at the same time, its troops committed grave violations of international humanitarian law by attacking and killing unarmed civilians..lakini please dont tell us kuwa RPF crimes were as equal as those of akina Jean Bosco Byragwiza, Hassan Ngezi and the Catholic Churcth in Rwanda during the genocide.

For your info the RPF was commonly acknowledged by military experts to be a highly disciplined force, with clear lines of command and adequate communication (this was also evident wakati wa ARUSHA NEGOTIATIONS na ukitaka taarifa zaidi ongea na Mzee Mpungwe). Although it may have become less disciplined during the months of the genocide due to the incorporation of new recruits, RPF commanding officers like Paul Kagame maintained the authority necessary to ensure compliance with their orders.

Unless you have something to back up your arguments kama huna please ingia chimbo then uje tuzungumze...lakini kwa kukusaidi tuu you might wanna start with these:

1) Mpungwe Ami (1999), Crises and Response in Rwanda: Reflections on the Arusha Peace
Process, Whither Peacekeeping in Africa? No 36

2) Mahmood Mamdani (2002) When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda

Anonymous said...

Game theory,
I couldn’t agree with you more!

Thuwein said...

Kaka, the book we are talking about just came out last month. So we can appreciate the freshness of the material and these folks are basically trying to explain the genocide on the side that MSM failed to cover. Now, the authors are well respected academics and they have credible people who went on the record in this work. I suggest people read it and point out the area of disagreement.

Kwani? from what is posted above what do you disagree with?

I wish I could go chimbo for more info, but I don't have time for now. I just enjoyed this book, and I think if folks can read it with open mind they can make their own conclusion.

GAME THEORY said...

Thuwein,

Kama msomi walau ungechambua na kuleta arguments on why you said RPF 'is as guilty as anybody else for war crimes' ....na how they have successfully created the illusion kuwa wako clean....and if they didn't liberate Rwanda during the genocide then who did.

Surely msomi kama wewe you are expected to come up with something more than mumbo jumbo sweeping statements like you did. Alot is expected from you. Personally, ive said above kuwa ndio kulikuwa na atrocities during the war but you cant equate what the Government of Rwanda did with RPF

robert said...

I think what Thuweni is trying to elaborate here is the fact that RPF has been glorified for years for act of heroism and liberation and completely obscuring their obvious participation in slaughtering of innocent lives during the civil war. If i'm not mistaken in no time in his statement did he say RPF hadn't play part in liberating the people of Rwanda as you so clearly claimed. Personally i think there is more than enough blame to go around, a lot of people failed the people of Rwanda during those horrific times and it saddens me and a lot of people i might imagine that Rwandans themselves gets the bigger slice. I admit war times are nasty times but no party should be exempted from war crimes simply because it was so claimed they were fighting for liberation. Possibly what exactly happened during the genocide in Rwanda may continue to elude us, but if any of the claimed facts can be proven will like to see those people in The Hague and charged rightfully so.

robert said...

Game Theory,

I think what Thuweni is trying to elaborate here is the fact that RPF has been glorified for years for act of heroism and liberation and completely obscuring their obvious participation in slaughtering of innocent lives during the civil war. If i'm not mistaken in no time in his statement did he say RPF hadn't play part in liberating the people of Rwanda as you so clearly claimed. Personally i think there is more than enough blame to go around, a lot of people failed the people of Rwanda during those horrific times and it saddens me and a lot of people i might imagine that Rwandans themselves gets the bigger slice. I admit war times are nasty times but no party should be exempted from war crimes simply because it was so claimed they were fighting for liberation. Possibly what exactly happened during the genocide in Rwanda may continue to elude us, but if any of the claimed facts can be proven will like to see those people in The Hague and charged rightfully so.